The Untold Story Behind the DARE Program: A Mix of Politics, Policing, and Profit
For many Americans, the DARE program—Drug Abuse Resistance Education—is a familiar memory from elementary school. Police officers would visit classrooms, open briefcases filled with drugs, and deliver stern warnings to kids about the dangers of substance abuse. It was a program embraced nationwide, reaching over 114 million Americans across 75% of U.S. school districts by the mid-1990s, backed by presidents, celebrities, and even having its own national holiday. But beneath this well-known surface lies a complex, controversial story of failure, secrecy, and questionable motives that shaped the program and its legacy.
The Failure Everyone Knew But Few Questioned
Despite its widespread presence and popularity, research consistently showed that DARE did not work as intended. Some studies even found that students who went through the program were more likely to experiment with drugs than those who did not. This paradox raised questions: Why did DARE persist despite clear evidence of its ineffectiveness? And who was really steering this massive anti-drug campaign?
A Board of Billionaires, Scandals, and Secret Agendas
Looking at the 2001 DARE board of directors reveals a startling mix of billionaires, multi-millionaires, lawyers, former law enforcement officers with checkered pasts, and controversial public figures. Among them were individuals linked to corruption scandals, drug-related conspiracies, and financial crimes. This powerful group wielded significant influence over the program that shaped millions of children’s views on drugs and authority.
Daryl Gates: The Man Who Made DARE What It Became
Central to DARE’s creation was Daryl Gates, a former Los Angeles Police Chief known for his ego and controversial policing tactics. Gates had a history of aggressive law enforcement, including the founding of SWAT and brutal raids on the Black Panthers. He also oversaw an intelligence division that infiltrated and spied on political groups, journalists, and activists, often illegally.
When researchers from USC, who had been developing a drug prevention program called Project Smart, rejected police involvement due to concerns about effectiveness and ethics, Gates pushed forward with his own vision: police officers teaching drug resistance in schools. Despite being warned that certain components of the program were ineffective and potentially harmful, Gates insisted on keeping them, suggesting motives beyond simple drug education.
Using Children as Informants and the Problem of Trust
One of the more disturbing aspects of DARE was its encouragement of children to report on drug use — even within their families. Kids were given “confession boxes” to share confidential information, which sometimes led to children turning their parents in for drug use. This practice raised ethical concerns about trust, privacy, and the psychological impact on children.
The Business of DARE: Fundraising, Nonprofits, and Dark Money
DARE was structured as a nonprofit, enabling police departments to circumvent restrictions on accepting money directly by funneling donations through private foundations. These nonprofits collected funds from wealthy donors and corporations, including controversial figures involved in financial scandals.
The program's decentralized business model resembled a multi-level marketing scheme, pushing officers to become fundraisers and expand the program aggressively. This networked structure helped DARE grow rapidly but also raised questions about its true priorities.
Suppression of Research and Intimidation
When independent researchers presented findings that DARE was ineffective, the Department of Justice, which funded the program, refused to publish the studies. Attempts by journalists and academics to expose DARE’s failures were met with legal threats, intimidation, and coordinated campaigns to discredit critics.
A Legacy of Controversy and a New Beginning?
After decades of criticism and scandal, DARE officially admitted on its website that its original program did not work. In response, it launched a revamped curriculum that shows more promise, evaluated by experts connected to earlier successful programs.
Today, DARE is making a comeback, with renewed support from law enforcement and government officials. Whether this new iteration will finally deliver on its promises remains to be seen.
What Can We Learn From the DARE Story?
The history of DARE is a cautionary tale about the intersection of politics, policing, education, and money. It challenges us to critically evaluate programs designed to protect our children and to demand transparency, scientific rigor, and ethical standards.
As parents, educators, and citizens, it’s essential to ask tough questions:
- Who designs programs that impact our youth?
- Are they truly evidence-based and effective?
- What hidden agendas might influence public initiatives?
By understanding the complexities and controversies behind DARE, we can better advocate for drug education programs that genuinely help children make healthy choices — without unintended harm or exploitation.
Further Reading and Resources:
- Research on drug education program effectiveness
- History of policing and intelligence operations in schools
- Ethics of using children as informants
- Transparency in nonprofit fundraising and police foundations
Final Thought
The next time you see a police officer stepping into a classroom to talk about drugs, remember the complicated legacy behind the badge and the program. Education and prevention are vital, but only when grounded in truth, care, and respect for the very children they aim to protect.