[00:00] (0.00s)
there's a conspiracy that's so intricate
[00:02] (2.28s)
that it's gained a cult following I've
[00:04] (4.26s)
heard of it and so have you but it's
[00:06] (6.60s)
getting out of hand nine months ago a
[00:08] (8.94s)
post appeared on Reddit it asks the
[00:10] (10.68s)
question does The Simpsons predict the
[00:13] (13.02s)
future from predicting the 2020 election
[00:15] (15.42s)
of Donald Trump to Lady Gaga's Super
[00:17] (17.46s)
Bowl halftime show the question in this
[00:19] (19.50s)
post has been asked many times something
[00:21] (21.60s)
really bothered me about this post with
[00:23] (23.88s)
zero-up votes the responses to the
[00:26] (26.16s)
latter half
[00:27] (27.42s)
it was a catastrophic flood of deranged
[00:29] (29.64s)
theories responses based around the idea
[00:31] (31.80s)
of a new world order explaining that The
[00:33] (33.90s)
Simpsons is the vessel used by the
[00:35] (35.64s)
ruling Elite to tell us what's coming
[00:37] (37.26s)
and it wasn't just this thread the
[00:39] (39.66s)
dialogue is everywhere the show's
[00:41] (41.10s)
Creator is a Freemason Jeffrey Epstein
[00:43] (43.86s)
September 11th these theories are
[00:45] (45.90s)
endless but they still leave the
[00:47] (47.40s)
question open the predictions how are
[00:50] (50.04s)
they doing it you've probably heard the
[00:51] (51.54s)
conspiracy theory that the Simpsons can
[00:52] (52.98s)
predict everything about the future who
[00:54] (54.84s)
are the world's greatest accurate
[00:56] (56.28s)
predictions predicted the future some of
[00:58] (58.14s)
these predictions are clearly surface
[00:59] (59.40s)
level others are alarmingly
[01:01] (61.44s)
sophisticated so for the past four
[01:03] (63.54s)
months we've been searching for an
[01:04] (64.74s)
answer one that will finally satisfy us
[01:06] (66.72s)
we listen to Common theories and we had
[01:08] (68.70s)
assumptions of our own we went the extra
[01:10] (70.32s)
mile collecting data that we couldn't
[01:11] (71.76s)
find on the internet hiring
[01:13] (73.14s)
statisticians and interviewing experts
[01:14] (74.82s)
at times it felt ridiculous
[01:18] (78.12s)
but when we ran the numbers one
[01:19] (79.68s)
explanation stood Above the Rest so
[01:21] (81.78s)
everyone is wrong one that was left of
[01:23] (83.46s)
the mainstream narrative almost entirely
[01:26] (86.10s)
this video was meant to be a
[01:27] (87.42s)
counterbalance to the flood of
[01:28] (88.68s)
derangement but it turned out to be the
[01:30] (90.66s)
kind of thing that makes you stop look
[01:32] (92.10s)
at yourself in the mirror and say holy
[01:35] (95.88s)
this is a story about the undeniable
[01:37] (97.68s)
humor of our reality and how the human
[01:39] (99.72s)
brain interprets the world around us
[01:41] (101.64s)
what is the mind is it just a system of
[01:45] (105.72s)
impulses or is it something tangible
[01:50] (110.26s)
[Applause]
[01:51] (111.79s)
[Music]
[01:56] (116.36s)
what is mine no matter what is matter
[02:00] (120.36s)
never mind
[02:03] (123.06s)
you know I've owned this mic for years
[02:04] (124.68s)
and this is my first time using it
[02:07] (127.08s)
[ __ ] that opening was pretty dramatic
[02:09] (129.84s)
I'm sorry but I had to for real the
[02:12] (132.00s)
story is super interesting I want to
[02:13] (133.92s)
show you for years even the mainstream
[02:15] (135.90s)
news has been asking how and they seem
[02:18] (138.18s)
to have come up with the most simple
[02:19] (139.26s)
explanation so that's where we started
[02:21] (141.12s)
so Simpsons predicted part one The
[02:23] (143.34s)
Simpsons predicting the future their
[02:24] (144.90s)
explanation is based off a quote from an
[02:26] (146.64s)
assistant math professor Assistant math
[02:28] (148.50s)
professor at the University of Albany
[02:29] (149.94s)
here's how the logic Goes The Simpsons
[02:31] (151.92s)
is one of the longest running shows of
[02:33] (153.72s)
all time in 29 Seasons 120
[02:39] (159.84s)
000 jokes 8.54 jokes per minute they say
[02:45] (165.36s)
it's just a numbers game this only comes
[02:47] (167.22s)
down to about a 1.6 success rate
[02:55] (175.20s)
the Chalk's too big
[02:57] (177.90s)
they compare it to Star Trek which has
[03:00] (180.06s)
had a similar number of episodes Star
[03:01] (181.68s)
Trek comprises over 760 episodes of
[03:04] (184.14s)
television and 13 feature films Star
[03:06] (186.06s)
Trek has also predicted the future wait
[03:08] (188.46s)
a second what other television show has
[03:10] (190.62s)
over 700 episodes
[03:12] (192.66s)
so these shows have just had more
[03:14] (194.10s)
opportunity to be right with that many
[03:16] (196.26s)
predictions they essentially just got
[03:18] (198.60s)
lucky they argue that there's nothing
[03:19] (199.98s)
special about the Simpsons predicting
[03:21] (201.60s)
the future because other shows have done
[03:27] (207.42s)
it's luck I was disappointed too
[03:30] (210.24s)
until we took a closer look
[03:34] (214.26s)
the theory rests on this Foundation
[03:36] (216.30s)
alone that the two shows have a similar
[03:38] (218.64s)
number of episodes and that they have a
[03:40] (220.32s)
similar number of accurate predictions
[03:42] (222.78s)
but that's not true The Simpsons have
[03:45] (225.18s)
had more predictions come true than
[03:46] (226.62s)
other shows like by a lot the answer
[03:49] (229.20s)
really feels like it's missing something
[03:50] (230.88s)
like it's only half of the explanation
[03:53] (233.70s)
transporter room energize and look at
[03:58] (238.26s)
Star Trek predicted [ __ ] like flip
[04:00] (240.18s)
phones prepare the beam Scotty onboard
[04:01] (241.98s)
flat screen TVs
[04:03] (243.62s)
they're really easy to dismiss as
[04:05] (245.88s)
coincidence luck whatever you want to
[04:07] (247.56s)
call it from Star Trek it's all of them
[04:09] (249.36s)
and The Simpsons they have some of these
[04:11] (251.28s)
two video calls autocorrect The
[04:13] (253.68s)
Coincidence explanation makes sense here
[04:15] (255.42s)
these shallow predictions don't Merit
[04:18] (258.00s)
screaming headlines nobody's talking
[04:20] (260.28s)
about them certainly not Reddit they
[04:22] (262.26s)
don't make it to the conspiracy boards
[04:24] (264.06s)
those boards are focused on things that
[04:26] (266.10s)
are more elaborate and intricate
[04:28] (268.14s)
alarmingly sophisticated predictions the
[04:30] (270.72s)
reason that the it's a numbers game
[04:32] (272.70s)
narrative feels like only half of the
[04:34] (274.74s)
truth is because it is the mainstream
[04:36] (276.54s)
theory is answering a question that no
[04:38] (278.88s)
one is asking
[04:41] (281.18s)
scientists believe they are getting
[04:43] (283.26s)
closer to proving the existence of the
[04:46] (286.14s)
Higgs boson the hypothetical subatomic
[04:49] (289.38s)
particle thought to supply Mass to the
[04:51] (291.42s)
matter that makes up our universe an
[04:53] (293.82s)
experiment is to resume Wednesday at the
[04:55] (295.92s)
Large Hadron Collider near Geneva
[04:57] (297.84s)
designed to catch a glimpse of the
[05:00] (300.24s)
so-called God particle in 2012
[05:03] (303.06s)
scientists at CERN discovered the
[05:04] (304.98s)
missing God Particle a previously
[05:06] (306.90s)
unknown building block of our universe
[05:08] (308.64s)
today known as the Higgs boson it
[05:10] (310.98s)
fundamentally changes our understanding
[05:12] (312.60s)
of the universe a massive Discovery for
[05:14] (314.76s)
quantum physics there's nothing else
[05:16] (316.32s)
like pigs in nature this is a completely
[05:18] (318.78s)
new kind of scientists believe that
[05:20] (320.40s)
without the Higgs there would be no
[05:22] (322.20s)
gravity and no Universe 15 years earlier
[05:25] (325.62s)
in the 1998 episode Homer wrote this
[05:28] (328.44s)
equation on the Blackboard the viewers
[05:30] (330.18s)
it meant nothing it was absolute jargon
[05:32] (332.16s)
at that stage so this is a long time ago
[05:37] (337.14s)
nobody knew the mass of the hipped boson
[05:39] (339.18s)
nobody even knew if it existed the
[05:40] (340.86s)
equation predicted the mass of the
[05:42] (342.36s)
missing God Particle so precisely that
[05:44] (344.70s)
he was only this far off this
[05:47] (347.04s)
breakthrough in understanding the
[05:48] (348.42s)
origins of mass 15 whole years before it
[05:51] (351.12s)
was discovered
[05:54] (354.74s)
this scene is by far the most specific
[05:57] (357.48s)
prediction The Simpsons has made to a
[05:59] (359.52s)
shocking level of accuracy the question
[06:01] (361.38s)
we're asking the question that's been
[06:03] (363.06s)
asked for 30 years the answer to this
[06:05] (365.28s)
whole video it must be buried in this
[06:07] (367.56s)
one scene the first equation on the
[06:09] (369.96s)
board is an attempt to estimate the mass
[06:13] (373.80s)
of the Higgs boson and as a particle
[06:15] (375.72s)
physicist that resonated with me
[06:20] (380.82s)
we're going to do the math [ __ ] are you
[06:23] (383.40s)
serious
[06:33] (393.26s)
I made my friend Mia watch a hundred
[06:35] (395.70s)
episodes of The Simpsons randomly picked
[06:37] (397.86s)
from All Seasons I couldn't get over it
[06:39] (399.78s)
like the government is listening to
[06:41] (401.22s)
everybody's confidence Edward snowden's
[06:43] (403.74s)
NSA spying Scandal they made the
[06:46] (406.08s)
prediction five years before it even
[06:47] (407.76s)
came true Trump's presidency 17 years
[06:50] (410.52s)
we've inherited quite a budget crunch
[06:52] (412.26s)
for president Trump
[06:53] (413.58s)
Disney buys Fox 19 years statue of David
[06:56] (416.82s)
censorship 26 years
[07:01] (421.20s)
okay it's not a deep State plot and it's
[07:03] (423.72s)
not by Chance the show's executive
[07:05] (425.22s)
producer Al Jean says that they're
[07:07] (427.02s)
somehow predicting these intentionally
[07:09] (429.24s)
any award-winning producer writer works
[07:12] (432.60s)
on The Simpsons uh since the start in
[07:14] (434.76s)
1989. one overwhelming factor determines
[07:17] (437.40s)
the content of the show is that we are
[07:18] (438.84s)
produced a year in advance like the clip
[07:20] (440.46s)
I just showed
[07:22] (442.14s)
um we're actually amateur futurologists
[07:24] (444.66s)
how the [ __ ] are they doing this
[07:27] (447.29s)
[Music]
[07:28] (448.74s)
okay I've got all the numbers
[07:32] (452.88s)
I counted every time the show had a joke
[07:35] (455.40s)
or had a plot device that had the
[07:37] (457.38s)
potential to come true Mia's discoveries
[07:39] (459.36s)
were worthy of reshaping how I perceived
[07:41] (461.94s)
the word prediction up until now I've
[07:44] (464.10s)
been seeing this whole Spectrum as
[07:45] (465.96s)
predictions but it's really not fair to
[07:48] (468.06s)
say that this is the same as this nine
[07:51] (471.84s)
bucks this one's on me there was one
[07:53] (473.70s)
crazy cell where Bart held up a brochure
[07:55] (475.50s)
that is New York on nine dollars a day
[07:57] (477.42s)
the World Trade Center this was in 1996.
[08:00] (480.12s)
it was in the background so it looked
[08:01] (481.74s)
like 9 11. that was insane and of course
[08:04] (484.44s)
unplanned it was a terrible coincidence
[08:07] (487.02s)
that was algene the show's current
[08:09] (489.78s)
executive producer and former showrunner
[08:12] (492.12s)
conspiracy theorists online claimed that
[08:13] (493.86s)
this is proof that the Deep State
[08:15] (495.54s)
masterminds behind the show knew of 9 11
[08:17] (497.76s)
5 years in advance the episode is
[08:20] (500.16s)
completely absent of anything to do with
[08:21] (501.84s)
the attack it's a magazine with the New
[08:23] (503.70s)
York skyline that's a coincidence
[08:25] (505.74s)
according to the internet there's 43
[08:28] (508.14s)
predictions that The Simpsons got right
[08:30] (510.00s)
but I think 13 of them are coincidences
[08:32] (512.88s)
looking at the other 30 predictions with
[08:35] (515.52s)
a degree of like 95 confidence and a
[08:38] (518.94s)
peace score around like 0.11 I think
[08:42] (522.12s)
it's clear that she said a bunch of
[08:44] (524.34s)
other [ __ ] that totally went above my
[08:45] (525.90s)
head it made me realize that we needed
[08:47] (527.82s)
to get a real professional involved this
[08:49] (529.98s)
other part of the spectrum with 30
[08:51] (531.96s)
examples unexplained by coincidence what
[08:54] (534.66s)
does it mean foreign
[08:57] (537.84s)
I reached out to his statistician on
[08:59] (539.58s)
Fiverr but they turn out to be a bot
[09:01] (541.26s)
impersonating a crypto influencer thanks
[09:03] (543.78s)
Fiverr luckily Mia knew a real
[09:05] (545.76s)
professional so here's what they said
[09:07] (547.80s)
hey we're rolling on both of mine
[09:10] (550.92s)
okay predicting the future is
[09:13] (553.14s)
notoriously difficult so the fact that
[09:15] (555.24s)
the Simpsons has managed to do it 30
[09:17] (557.28s)
times could be seen as statistically
[09:20] (560.04s)
significant and compared to other shows
[09:22] (562.50s)
like Star Trek Futurama South Park The
[09:25] (565.32s)
Simpsons does Stand Out holy [ __ ]
[09:29] (569.10s)
so everyone is wrong
[09:34] (574.94s)
my name's Simon Singh I live in London
[09:37] (577.56s)
and uh gosh I suppose for 15 20 years
[09:40] (580.86s)
I've been writing books about
[09:42] (582.06s)
mathematics and physics Simon wrote a
[09:44] (584.46s)
book about The Simpsons too but he's
[09:46] (586.50s)
being humble here he's a theoretical and
[09:48] (588.54s)
particle physicist he contributed to
[09:50] (590.40s)
other discoveries at CERN where the
[09:52] (592.02s)
Higgs boson was discovered if there's
[09:53] (593.76s)
one person that has the answer it's him
[09:55] (595.80s)
when you have such a long-running show
[09:57] (597.90s)
that covers so many different topics
[10:00] (600.36s)
there are bound to be things that that
[10:02] (602.16s)
turn out to be true in due course part
[10:04] (604.80s)
of getting it right is luck but the big
[10:07] (607.08s)
ones the ones that are impossible to
[10:09] (609.30s)
explain by coincidence the ones that
[10:11] (611.10s)
spark up conspiracies on Reddit those
[10:13] (613.14s)
are not predictions
[10:14] (614.94s)
at all so I got in touch with with the
[10:17] (617.58s)
the the the writer of that episode
[10:20] (620.04s)
um David X Cohen now David X Cohen did a
[10:22] (622.74s)
degree in physics and then did a
[10:24] (624.54s)
master's degree in computer science and
[10:26] (626.64s)
then had published papers in
[10:29] (629.28s)
mathematical journals so he was a smart
[10:31] (631.86s)
guy he loved math and he loved physics
[10:33] (633.72s)
as he wanted to create this equation and
[10:36] (636.84s)
put it on the board so he rang up his
[10:38] (638.82s)
friend David shaminovich who was a
[10:41] (641.34s)
professor at Columbia they'd been at
[10:43] (643.08s)
high school together he said to David
[10:44] (644.58s)
shermanovic could you concoct an
[10:46] (646.68s)
equation that would somehow give the
[10:50] (650.22s)
right result
[10:51] (651.98s)
all right I'm not going to use anecdotal
[10:54] (654.90s)
evidence from just one example as a
[10:57] (657.06s)
cop-out conclusion here while Mia was
[10:59] (659.16s)
working on her research I came across
[11:01] (661.98s)
something interesting our distinguished
[11:04] (664.50s)
panel members with us they are
[11:06] (666.60s)
award-winning writers and producers of
[11:09] (669.72s)
Simpson our panelists also hold an
[11:11] (671.94s)
impressive array of degrees in
[11:13] (673.68s)
mathematics computer science and
[11:15] (675.36s)
philosophy among others the thing is you
[11:17] (677.16s)
could assemble a panel of other kinds of
[11:19] (679.02s)
nerds from The Simpsons as well like
[11:20] (680.88s)
like there are millions of jokes about
[11:22] (682.32s)
the presidents of the United States for
[11:24] (684.90s)
example I'm looking at Patrick Veron
[11:26] (686.34s)
who's a presidential scholar but really
[11:28] (688.02s)
there's a lot of people with different
[11:29] (689.34s)
interests and they're all trying to cram
[11:30] (690.78s)
all this stuff in unlike most other
[11:32] (692.22s)
shows The Simpsons writing team consists
[11:34] (694.50s)
largely of writers who are extremely
[11:36] (696.60s)
educated in fields ranging from
[11:38] (698.58s)
mathematics to social sciences and
[11:40] (700.98s)
because of this they're also really
[11:42] (702.96s)
connected to those that are on The
[11:44] (704.64s)
Cutting Edge let me play this back so he
[11:46] (706.80s)
rang up his friend David shimenovich who
[11:49] (709.56s)
is a professor at Columbia and they high
[11:51] (711.84s)
school together but they didn't just
[11:53] (713.22s)
know each other from high school
[11:54] (714.60s)
together they formed a gang of teenage
[11:57] (717.00s)
computer programmers called The Glitch
[11:58] (718.80s)
Masters they even wrote their own
[12:00] (720.60s)
computer language and after studying
[12:02] (722.58s)
physics at Harvard Kohan rejected a
[12:04] (724.80s)
career in Academia to pursue writing
[12:06] (726.66s)
shaminovic was just one of many
[12:08] (728.70s)
connections of his in the field you got
[12:10] (730.92s)
the math people today but this same
[12:12] (732.72s)
panel could be going on in thousands of
[12:14] (734.70s)
locations at the same time on different
[12:16] (736.92s)
subjects you know when they came up with
[12:18] (738.72s)
the equation for the Higgs boson they
[12:20] (740.58s)
could have come up with any old clutch
[12:22] (742.98s)
of Greek symbols but no they picked
[12:25] (745.92s)
genuine physical constants when combined
[12:29] (749.22s)
in the right way gave a massive Higgs
[12:31] (751.80s)
boson that was plausible so they sort of
[12:33] (753.60s)
said here whenever we put mathematics
[12:35] (755.16s)
into the show we've got to get it right
[12:36] (756.96s)
but we'll make sure it's true we'll make
[12:38] (758.76s)
sure it's accurate this mindset goes
[12:40] (760.56s)
beyond math for the writers of The
[12:42] (762.12s)
Simpsons these aren't just random things
[12:44] (764.28s)
these are equations that have a lot of
[12:46] (766.50s)
thought put into them before they appear
[12:47] (767.94s)
on screen earlier in this video I
[12:49] (769.98s)
claimed that the equation Blackboard was
[12:52] (772.26s)
precise he was only this far off but
[12:55] (775.38s)
this amount of error on the particle
[12:57] (777.12s)
level is incredibly significant they
[12:59] (779.52s)
were way off from a possible physics
[13:01] (781.56s)
point of view it's not a very good
[13:02] (782.88s)
equation the content on the Blackboard
[13:04] (784.38s)
was put there by a writer who had a
[13:06] (786.18s)
pulse on mathematics something that's
[13:07] (787.98s)
just not in the public eye it wasn't
[13:10] (790.08s)
even a prediction it was a corny joke
[13:12] (792.12s)
poking fun at something very real and
[13:14] (794.16s)
very absurd in true satire fashion it's
[13:17] (797.34s)
a pattern and it explains these this
[13:19] (799.80s)
sounds like political presidential talk
[13:22] (802.26s)
to me and I know people have talked to
[13:23] (803.52s)
you about whether or not you want to run
[13:24] (804.66s)
I do get tired of seeing what's
[13:26] (806.04s)
happening with this country and if it
[13:27] (807.42s)
got so bad I would never want to rule it
[13:29] (809.40s)
out totally Trump hinted at the
[13:30] (810.84s)
presidency 12 years before The Simpsons
[13:33] (813.54s)
made this episode president Trump yet
[13:36] (816.54s)
again a corny joke poking fun and
[13:38] (818.52s)
something very real and very absurd but
[13:40] (820.80s)
this joke is making fun of something
[13:42] (822.72s)
that's not in the public eye would you
[13:45] (825.18s)
would you ever
[13:46] (826.44s)
probably not why would you not I just
[13:49] (829.02s)
don't think I really have the
[13:50] (830.70s)
inclination to do it I love what I'm
[13:52] (832.20s)
doing I really like it also it doesn't
[13:54] (834.06s)
pay as well yeah so here's the whole
[13:56] (836.52s)
truth we can finally put it to rest The
[13:58] (838.74s)
Simpsons are not predicting the future
[14:00] (840.00s)
it's just intricate writing
[14:02] (842.40s)
I was left with the question why why put
[14:05] (845.76s)
all this effort in so I got my hands
[14:07] (847.62s)
dirty I scraped the web for all of the
[14:09] (849.78s)
data that I could find and I compared it
[14:11] (851.34s)
to Mia's findings hundreds of lines of
[14:13] (853.50s)
code later the answer revealed itself
[14:17] (857.76s)
here's a chart of all of the accurate
[14:19] (859.38s)
predictions made by The Simpsons sorted
[14:21] (861.36s)
by season we found data that someone
[14:23] (863.16s)
else collected which I Linked In the
[14:25] (865.02s)
description but using it we found that
[14:27] (867.00s)
it takes about 13 years for The Simpsons
[14:29] (869.34s)
predictions to come true on average if
[14:31] (871.86s)
you look closely a pattern merges a
[14:34] (874.08s)
pattern that follows the user rating of
[14:36] (876.18s)
each episode
[14:37] (877.50s)
the show is a satire on American culture
[14:40] (880.02s)
they're making fun of us that's kind of
[14:41] (881.88s)
the whole point right good writing is
[14:43] (883.98s)
socially politically scientifically
[14:45] (885.66s)
aware the writers want this not only is
[14:48] (888.84s)
it more fun for them but it makes the
[14:50] (890.52s)
show more interesting for us at least
[14:52] (892.98s)
according to IMDb here's my final case
[14:55] (895.32s)
it looks messy but stick with me each of
[14:57] (897.84s)
these lines is one writer for The
[14:59] (899.40s)
Simpsons some only wrote One season and
[15:01] (901.86s)
they never came back others wrote and
[15:03] (903.78s)
they took a break for several seasons
[15:05] (905.28s)
but they returned in his book The
[15:06] (906.96s)
Simpsons and their mathematical Secrets
[15:08] (908.88s)
Simon includes a list of some of the
[15:10] (910.68s)
writers with extensive degrees
[15:13] (913.68s)
what do you think do the predictions
[15:15] (915.42s)
mostly happen when these writers are
[15:18] (918.06s)
around one of the things about jokes and
[15:21] (921.12s)
probably philosophy and perhaps math is
[15:24] (924.90s)
um once you're done with them they seem
[15:27] (927.78s)
like they were obvious all along
[15:31] (931.23s)
[Music]
[15:35] (935.40s)
a 2001 episode involved Homer attempting
[15:38] (938.16s)
to prevent his local baseball team the
[15:40] (940.20s)
Isotopes for moving to Albuquerque two
[15:42] (942.42s)
years later the Albuquerque minor league
[15:44] (944.16s)
team was named the Isotopes the town
[15:46] (946.32s)
held a vote to determine the name of the
[15:47] (947.94s)
team the team president even admitted
[15:49] (949.74s)
that the name came from the series our
[15:51] (951.90s)
explanation is not a catch-all there's
[15:54] (954.06s)
few unique exceptions here laws of
[15:56] (956.34s)
Statistics are weird and they can make
[15:58] (958.50s)
some truly absurd coincidences happen
[16:00] (960.60s)
New York City has a population of around
[16:02] (962.58s)
9 million people and with that many
[16:04] (964.50s)
people a one in a million event should
[16:06] (966.66s)
happen nine times a day there as always
[16:09] (969.12s)
there's room for disagreement I hope I
[16:11] (971.28s)
made a compelling argument I really did
[16:13] (973.44s)
feel a little bit silly making this
[16:15] (975.30s)
video but I posted a promo for it and
[16:18] (978.12s)
after seeing some of the comments that
[16:19] (979.74s)
came out
[16:21] (981.44s)
I was genuinely concerned conspiracy
[16:24] (984.30s)
theories can be a real problem and
[16:25] (985.92s)
seeing them proliferate it's not
[16:27] (987.78s)
something that I love I don't fault
[16:29] (989.64s)
people for mistaking complexity for
[16:31] (991.68s)
conspiracy especially because
[16:33] (993.42s)
conspiracies can be fun but often the
[16:35] (995.46s)
truth can be even better thanks for
[16:37] (997.38s)
watching